1959 Cadillac Seville vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1969 ZAZ 966 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Seville (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1460 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac Seville | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Cadillac | ZAZ |
| Model | Seville | 966 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2170 mm |
