1959 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 225 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1959 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chevrolet Corvair | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Corvair | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2770 mm |