1959 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1959 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 4,636 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Chevrolet Corvette (227 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 58 kg more than 1959 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chevrolet Corvette | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
Model | Corvette | Commander |
Year Released | 1959 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4636 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 111.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3030 mm |