1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 620 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elan.
Because 1959 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Chevrolet Impala | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Impala | Elan |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2260 mm |
