1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 900 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Impala | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 1810 mm |
