1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2003 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 260 kg more than 1959 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2003 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Impala | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3851 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2800 mm |