1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | UTE |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3851 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2950 mm |