1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 307 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Because 1959 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Impala | Alero |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1333 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2850 mm |
