1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 45 kg more than 1959 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Impala | Outback |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3851 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2530 mm |