1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 112 kg more than 1959 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3851 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |