1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher.
Because 1959 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2006 Chevrolet Lumina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Impala | Lumina |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |