1959 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 205 kg more than 1959 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Impala | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2710 mm |
