1959 Chrysler Imperial vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1228 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (119 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1959 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Chrysler Imperial | 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
Make | Chrysler | Matra-Simca |
Model | Imperial | Rancho |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5802 cc | 1442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2530 mm |