1959 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Volvo S60. (208 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 600 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo S60. (407 Nm). This means 1959 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Chrysler Imperial | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Imperial | S60 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5802 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2720 mm |
