1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Citroen 2CV | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
Model | 2CV | Camaro |
Year Released | 1959 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 423 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 12 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2750 mm |