1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1982 Jaguar XJR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 300 kg more than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1982 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Citroen 2CV | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | 2CV | XJR |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 90 L |
