1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1959 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 879 kg more than 1959 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (200 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Armadillo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Citroen 2CV. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 1959 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1959 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Citroen 2CV | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Citroen | Fiat |
| Model | 2CV | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 423 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 12 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 25 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 1850 mm |
