1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Citroen 2CV. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1959 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1959 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Citroen 2CV | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | 2CV | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 12 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 25 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
