1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 1998 Lotus Emme

To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 250 more horse power than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1959 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Lotus Emme weights approximately 183 kg more than 1959 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1998 Lotus Emme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Lotus Emme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: