1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2001 Volvo SCC is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 1959 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 716 kg more than 1959 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (50 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Citroen 2CV. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 1959 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1959 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Citroen 2CV | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | SCC |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 850 cc | 2521 cc |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 50 Nm | 285 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 70 L |