1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1959 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1959 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Citroen 2CV | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 850 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |