1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (177 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | 6 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 423 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 12 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 25 Nm | 177 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 83.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 64 L |