1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (13 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | C70 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 24 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
