1959 Citroen 2CV vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 851 kg more than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Citroen 2CV | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | C30 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 24 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |