1959 Citroen DS vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Citroen DS (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Citroen DS should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Citroen DS weights approximately 720 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Citroen DS (137 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 1959 Citroen DS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Citroen DS | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Citroen | Tata |
| Model | DS | Nano |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 37 L |
