1959 DAF 600 vs. 1967 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1967 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Lancia Fulvia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Lancia Fulvia (87 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Lancia Fulvia weights approximately 295 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Lancia Fulvia (114 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Lancia Fulvia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DAF 600 | 1967 Lancia Fulvia | |
| Make | DAF | Lancia |
| Model | 600 | Fulvia |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 114 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 69.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 38 L |
