1959 DAF 600 vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 891 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DAF 600 | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | 600 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1521 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |
