1959 DAF 600 vs. 2004 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2004 Mazda Laputa is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 658 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Laputa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Laputa (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Laputa should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Laputa weights approximately 120 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Laputa (61 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda Laputa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DAF 600 | 2004 Mazda Laputa | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | Laputa |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 30 L |