1959 DAF 600 vs. 2005 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2005 Ford Mondeo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mondeo (154 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 848 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mondeo (367 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DAF 600 | 2005 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 600 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 367 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 58 L |