1959 DAF 600 vs. 2005 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2005 Lancia Zeta is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lancia Zeta (135 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 970 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lancia Zeta (186 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DAF 600 | 2005 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | DAF | Lancia |
Model | 600 | Zeta |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 80 L |