1959 DAF 600 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 114 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DAF 600 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | DAF | MCC |
| Model | 600 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1810 mm |
