1959 DAF 600 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (74 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 355 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DAF 600 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | DAF | Renault |
| Model | 600 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1148 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 50 L |
