1959 DAF 600 vs. 2012 Buick Regal
To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick Regal (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Buick Regal weights approximately 1003 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick Regal (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DAF 600 | 2012 Buick Regal | |
Make | DAF | Buick |
Model | 600 | Regal |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4831 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2738 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |