1959 DAF 600 vs. 2012 Citroen C1
To start off, 2012 Citroen C1 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 998 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C1 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C1 (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DAF 600 | 2012 Citroen C1 | |
Make | DAF | Citroen |
Model | 600 | C1 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 41 L |