1959 DKW F 93 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW F 93. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW F 93 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1959 DKW F 93. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW F 93. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 192 kg more than 1959 DKW F 93. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW F 93. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW F 93.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DKW F 93 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 93 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 918 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2540 mm |