1959 DKW F 93 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW F 93. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW F 93 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1959 DKW F 93. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW F 93.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 DKW F 93. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW F 93. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW F 93.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DKW F 93 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 93 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2840 mm |
