1959 DKW Junior vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 1979 Mazda 929 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Junior would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1959 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 929 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1959 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 929 (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Junior. (64 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DKW Junior | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Junior | 929 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 741 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |