1959 DKW Junior vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1983 Jaguar XJR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Junior would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 200 kg more than 1959 DKW Junior.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DKW Junior | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | Junior | XJR |
Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 741 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 90 L |