1959 DKW Junior vs. 2004 Lexus ES
To start off, 2004 Lexus ES is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Junior would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lexus ES (216 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1959 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lexus ES should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lexus ES weights approximately 869 kg more than 1959 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lexus ES (325 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Junior. (64 Nm). This means 2004 Lexus ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Junior. 2004 Lexus ES has automatic transmission and 1959 DKW Junior has manual transmission. 1959 DKW Junior will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lexus ES will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DKW Junior | 2004 Lexus ES | |
| Make | DKW | Lexus |
| Model | Junior | ES |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 741 cc | 3310 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 216 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 64 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1569 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
