1959 DKW Junior vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Junior would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1959 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Junior.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 DKW Junior. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Junior. (64 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DKW Junior | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Junior | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 741 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 78 L |