1959 DKW Junior vs. 2011 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2011 Ford Falcon is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Junior would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1959 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1057 kg more than 1959 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Falcon (409 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Junior. (64 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Junior. 2011 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1959 DKW Junior has manual transmission. 1959 DKW Junior will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DKW Junior | 2011 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Junior | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 741 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 64 Nm | 409 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | LPG |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1757 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4967 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1433 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2838 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
