1959 DKW Munga vs. 1963 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1963 Isuzu Minx is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Minx (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1959 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 DKW Munga weights approximately 80 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1959 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Isuzu Minx (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DKW Munga | 1963 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | DKW | Isuzu |
Model | Munga | Minx |
Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2440 mm |