1959 DKW Munga vs. 1980 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1959 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 DKW Munga weights approximately 10 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Because 1959 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Chrysler 1609 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DKW Munga | 1980 Chrysler 1609 | |
Make | DKW | Chrysler |
Model | Munga | 1609 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |