1959 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2004 Ford Lynx is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Lynx (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1959 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Lynx should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Munga.
Because 1959 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Lynx (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DKW Munga | 2004 Ford Lynx | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Lynx |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |
