1959 Fairthorpe Zeta vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta (138 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta weights approximately 23 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Fairthorpe | MCC |
| Model | Zeta | Smart |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 673 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
