1959 Fairthorpe Zeta vs. 2000 Volkswagen Quantum
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Quantum is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Quantum. (110 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Quantum. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volkswagen Quantum weights approximately 457 kg more than 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta.
Because 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Quantum, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Quantum. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Quantum. 2000 Volkswagen Quantum has automatic transmission and 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta has manual transmission. 1959 Fairthorpe Zeta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Volkswagen Quantum will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Fairthorpe Zeta | 2000 Volkswagen Quantum | |
Make | Fairthorpe | Volkswagen |
Model | Zeta | Quantum |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 92.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 673 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2560 mm |