1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa (296 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 489 kg more than 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa.
Because 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Ferrari | Seat |
| Model | 250 Testarossa | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 270 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2850 mm |
