1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa (296 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ferrari 250 Testarossa | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Ferrari | Smart |
| Model | 250 Testarossa | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 270 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 35 L |
