1959 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Riley RM A weights approximately 675 kg more than 1959 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 | 1950 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Ferrari | Riley |
| Model | 256 F1 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2870 mm |
