1959 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 1084 kg more than 1959 Ferrari 256 F1.
Because 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 has manual transmission. 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Ferrari | Oldsmobile |
Model | 256 F1 | Aurora |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2900 mm |